Robin Gareus wrote:
> Hi Rosea,
>
> rosea grammostola wrote:
>   
>> Robin Gareus wrote:
>>     
>>> rosea grammostola wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> rosea grammostola wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> Robin Gareus wrote:
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>> [..snip..]
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>>>>>>>>> BTW First test result of your kernel
>>>>>>>>> kernel panic - not syncing VFS unable to mount root fs on 
>>>>>>>>> unknown-block
>>>>>>>>> (0,0)
>>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>> Thanks for trying.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you have "do_initrd=yes" in /etc/kernel-img.conf ?
>>>>>>>> If not, run `sudo update-initramfs -k 2.6.31-rt10-multimedia -c`
>>>>>>>> followed by `sudo update-grub`
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you have an initrd (required to load both filesystem and disk 
>>>>>>>> kernel
>>>>>>>> modules during boot-time); please tell us what hardware your machine
>>>>>>>> has:  `lspci -v` and what modules are loaded on the 
>>>>>>>> 2.6.29-1-multimedia
>>>>>>>> kernel `lsmod`.
>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> I don't have that kernel installed...
>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> Did you have an initrd for 2.6.31-rt10 when the kernel panic happened?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> # lspci -v                             
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>  [... snip...]
>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your hardware (including wifi) is supported by 2.6.31-rt10-multimedia.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The error "unknown-block (0,0)" could mean that
>>>>>>  a) the kernel module for your 82801 (ata_piix) is not loaded
>>>>>>   -> missing initrd ; create it
>>>>>>  b) hda1 is not your root device.
>>>>>>   -> specfify root=/dev/XXX  on the kernel commandline or in
>>>>>>   /boot/grub/menu.lst
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (b) is unlikely since you are able to boot other kernels, with the same
>>>>>> grub defaults (unless you did some customization yourself of course)
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>> for a)
>>>>
>>>> # Kernel image management overrides
>>>> # See kernel-img.conf(5) for details
>>>> do_symlinks = yes
>>>> relative_links = yes
>>>> do_bootloader = no
>>>> do_bootfloppy = no
>>>> do_initrd = yes
>>>> link_in_boot = no
>>>> postinst_hook = update-grub
>>>> postrm_hook   = update-grub
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> OK. That should create an initrd just fine. But is it created without
>>> errors? There's still plenty of reasons why it may fail..
>>>
>>> Is /boot of your 64studio installation actually used by grub? (ie you
>>> may have grub and /boot from an other Linux installation (dual boot) on
>>> the same machine).
>>>
>>> Is there any Log message before the "unknown-block (0,0)" Panic message
>>> that provide clues on why it fails?
>>>
>>> Is there a message about the disk(s) and partitions being detected?
>>>
>>> Did you specify a root=/dev/[hs]da[0-9] parameter in /boot/grub/menu.lst
>>> Maybe older/other kernels use SCSI emulation hda vs. sda?
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> b) other kernels boots ok, custom changes
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> It does not seem to be a general problem with the 2.6.31-rt10-multimedia
>>>  more like some installation/setup edge-case.
>>>       
>> I use the kernel on Debian. I have Windows on my first partition, and 
>> then a root (/) and home partition for Debian. I also use grub2.
>>
>> No panic messages
>>     
>
>
> Did you try to generate the initd  by calling
> `sudo update-initramfs -k 2.6.31-rt10-multimedia -c` as mentioned above?
>   
Yes, no improvements
>
> I'm currently preparing 2.6.31-rt11 for i386, i686 and amd64 and will
> upload it to the 64studio repositories later tonight.
> I'll send out a notice on this list when it's ready for testing.
I happy to test the next one :) And I'm glad if there is rt2500 wireless 
support.
Is there also support for: 02:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom 
Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01) ?

Would be cool
\r



_______________________________________________
64studio-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-devel

Reply via email to