> > > Hi :) > > > the problem with the GUI is solved by using the hide functions, the > > mixer worked, but while trying to set the Reverb it crashes. I've to = say > > that my 64 Studio upgraded to Lenny isn't stable and maybe it's not a= ll > > This should not surprise you. There is a reason I leave the stable > version alone on the machine that gets things done. > > > right to use a package that is build for Ubuntu. > > (the short short version) > It depends. > > (the short version) > Ubuntu essentially takes a limited snapshot of Debian unstable and then=
> works to make it stable. So, sometimes this will work, sometimes not. Hi Gustin :) hi list Mixer report - Wish list for 64 Studio 3.0 I recommend to include LiveMix, if it's stable and jack_snapshot into 64 = Studio 3.0. Here's the reason why. I tested some mixers and than I tried to solve the= problem without a mixer featuring aux channels. jack_mixer - the Jack client name is "jack_mixer-[PID]", having the PID in the=20 client's name isn't good, when using jack_snapshot - it comes with faders and pan pots, that's ideal jackmaster - the Jack client name always is "jackmaster", that enables=20 jack_snapshot to store and restore connections - it comes with stereo faders that only can be used as gang, this is=20 only fine because I'll use the mixer as pseudo stereo aux channels jackmix - the jack client name always is "JackMix" - pots for left and right, that can't be used as gang, not useable to=20 mix intuitive jackmixdesk_gtk - I can't run it, there seems to be the need to read about LASH to launch= it Some mixers seems to be able to name the channels, some aren't able and=20 jackmaster auto-names the channels. I ignore the possibility if it's=20 able to fit the number of channels to the needs and if there is a way to = control the mixer by MIDI. My choice is jackmaster. The mixing without effects for the subgroups is done by Rosegarden's=20 mixer for the DSSI plugins and QSampler, automation is done by sending=20 MIDI controllers to the virtual instruments. _QJackCtl_ The dry sound In some cases there will be the need to use Rosegarden's submasters also = for the dry signals, but not for this issue rosegarden master out L --> jamin in_L rosegarden master out R --> jamin in_R LinuxSampler 0 --> jamin in_L LinuxSampler 1 --> jamin in_R To compensate the missing aux channels for the subgroups (in some cases=20 for single tracks, resp. instruments) and because QSampler is outside of = Rosegarden, there is the need to do confusing connections for the audio=20 signals that have to be send to the reverb. Pseudo auxs sends rosegarden submaster 1 out L --> jackmaster in-a-l rosegarden submaster 1 out R --> jackmaster in-a-r rosegarden submaster 2 out L --> jackmaster in-b-l rosegarden submaster 2 out R --> jackmaster in-b-r LinuxSampler 0 --> jackmaster in-c-l LinuxSampler 1 --> jackmaster in-c-r jackmaster sub-a-l --> jack_rack_[PID] in_1 jackmaster sub-a-r --> jack_rack_[PID] in_2 No pseudo aux return by not using JackMaster's in-d and sub-b, in some=20 cases it might be needed to have a pseudo aux return by connecting to=20 Jack Rack again, e.g. even 64 Studio upgraded to Lenny has no Jack Rack/G= Verb versions with a master output volume fader. jack_rack_[PID] gverb_1-1_o1 --> jamin in_L jack_rack_[PID] gverb_1-2_o1 --> jamin in_R The output JAMin should be inserted into a master stereo sum of an ideal virtual=20 mixer, but instead jamin out_L --> system playback_1 jamin out_R --> system playback_2 The main mix volume control will be DAC 0 and DAC 1 of Envy24 control. The connections for jack_rack can't be done by jack_snapshot. Instead of using a single mixer application, there is the need to use 4=20 applications for this example. MIDI controllers Rosegarden's mixer JackMaster GVerb's fader for the output sum, doing more connections for Jack, to=20 get a pseudo aux return, it will be 3 applications Because of crashes I only was able to do this with Rosegarden's master=20 out, also for the pseudo auxs sends, instead of the submasters, that are = needed. Instead of my broken 64 Studio, it's broken because I made an=20 upgrade to Debian's testing, I was using the "stable" Suse 11.0. I will do a new installation of 64 Studio 2.1, but I don't think a set up= like I described it will be much more stable after doing this. Rosegarde= n seems to be =20 invalid running together with Jack on my new hardware. Cheers, Ralf
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
