Folderol wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:32:16 +0100
> Daniel James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   
>> Hi Ralf,
>>
>>     
>>> Playing a 1.6.1 song with 1.7.0 is fine, but editing something
>>> can cause chaos.
>>>       
>> Does Rosegarden 1.7.0 crash when you try to record MIDI in the song made 
>> with 1.6.1? If so, I think there is a general bug there.
>>
>> Cheers!
>>
>> Daniel
>>     
>
> This is something I've reported on the Rosegarden list, but nothing
> seems to be happening about it. For me the problem doesn't occur at all
> with 1.6.1. It always occurs with 1.7.0 on new projects. It usually
> occurs with files that were started on older versions, but just
> occasionally I can use 1.7.0 to live record on top of a file that was
> started with older versions.
>
> Only the GUI crashes, the sequencer carries on playing existing tracks
> until they end.
>
> This is on a dual core athlon. On an older single core machine (with no
> RT kernel) it doesn't happen at all.
>
> I am wondering of it is a multi-core problem.
>   

Is anybody using Rosegarden with a 32-bit machine or with a 64-bit
non-multi core? Is it stable there?

When I installed DSSI instruments for Suse 64-bit Rosegarden didn't
found them, I searched for this by Google and found some postings.
Ubuntu users have the same problem, there are no DSSI plugins for
Rosegarden available. I found out, that I have to copy the DSSI plugins
from a folder /lib to a folder /lib64. Maybe there are some libs for
Rosegarden itself that are in a wrong folder. Okay, for 64 Studio the
DSSIs are fine by default, but maybe something is wrong, e.g a system
variable used by the program.

I guess I will have the time to record some MIDI today. I didn't do that
with a stable default 64 Studio before, maybe Rosegarden 1.7.0 will be
fine on my machine now.

Is there someone using a 64-bit 64 Studio (or another 64-bit distro,
with another rt kernel) running on an Athlon dual-core where Rosegarden
1.7.0 is fine?

If we need Rosegarden 1.6.1, I have found the old source code:

http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/11.0/repo/src-oss/suse/src/rosegarden4-1.6.1-61.1.src.rpm

Etch is 1.4.0 and Lenny is 1.7.0 and because a source code is a source
code, we could use the Suse source.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
64studio-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users

Reply via email to