Kevin Donnelly wrote:
> You've certainly spent a lot of time writing posts instead of making music.
>   

Because I can't make music with Linux.

> I think you probably need to wind back a bit.  First of all, double-check 
> your 
> PSU

The PSU is new, I can check it, but I don't think it's broken, voltage
informations by the BIOS are okay, but I can measure it too.

> , memory, and hard disk.

There's no difference if I only use my new SATA II or only the old IDE
or both together, especially no swap is needed and when no audio tracks
are in use, why will applications crash when I play MIDI events by the
master keyboard, while Rosegarden is in circle play mode, not recording,
just playing?

>   Random crashes are in my experience more often 
> due to flaky hardware (ie hardware that is not broken, but is about to 
> break). Even if everything works OK in Windows, that is no guarantee - 
> Windows isn't as picky as Linux.  Use memcheck, or try a new hard disk, or 
> swap in another PSU.
>   

I changed my complete hardware, everything is new, only the soundcard
isn't new, I can check it by a Hameg oscilloscope with a components
tester, but I'm sure the soundcard is fine.

> If you're content that all is OK on that front, pick one distro, install it, 
> and *stick to it* - don't jump around between distros, or even flavours of 
> distros.  DON'T change anything - on 64Studio, why do you need to compile 
> JACK or upgrade Rosegarden?

I didn't compile jack, I only compiled jack_snapshot, simply to compile
by make, without any configure or dependency trouble.
http://tapas.affenbande.org/wordpress/?page_id=14

I'm using Rosegarden 1.7.1, because 1.7.0 isn't fine. My 64 Studio
default install is a default install.

> 64Studio was put together specifically in order 
> to avoid your having to do that sort of thing.  Get the basic, default distro 
> working solidly first, and *then* (in a few months) start experimenting.
>   

It's the default install. We, not only I, had troubles with Rosegarden
1.7.0, that's why 1.7.1 is in the backport since yesterday. There are no
troubles with dependencies and nothing changed to 1.7.0, problems are
the same.

> One of the big problems with new Linux users is that they have itchy fingers 
> - 
> just because you can upgrade from different repos or compile the latest point 
> release of something doesn't mean you should.
>   

I'm not really a full noob ;), more a semi-noob, but anyway, 64 Studio
is default.

> My main machine runs openSUSE, and the JAD distro worked fine on that,

JAD comes with enlightenment 17 by default and enlightenment 17 isn't
stable. Or is there a new JAD released, not using enlightenment?

> but 
> there were intermittent problems that turned out to be a bad disk.  My music 
> machine (much lower spec) runs 64Studio, and it has worked fine so far.
>   

By the way, some problems even must be there for you, e.g. Suse's
Hydrogen has a patch, so that it is in better sync than the 64 Studio
version is, when using Jack transport to sync Hydrogen and Ardour. I
don't use Jack transport, so I don't have to compile the stable svn
version of Hydrogen, but for some users this should be an argument to
compile an application instead of using the default version of 64 Studio.

I'll change the RAM, check the soundcard and PSU and look for a new BIOS
update. But if there will be such broken hardware, I must have crashes,
also when using non-audio applications.

It might be interesting if somebody else has an ASUS M2A-VM HDMI, I
especially bought the ASUS, because my old mobo is an ASRock, and I
won't by an ASRock again.

It seems to be, that my hardware isn't broken and I'm using the default
install, excepted Rosegarden. I can reinstall the default version 1.7.0.
Maybe this will help.

Thank you again :). I still frustrated, because I don't think that my
hardware is broken and the reinstall to 1.7.0 will be a help, but maybe
I'm wrong.

I'll search Google for Memchecks.

Cheers,
Ralf

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
64studio-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users

Reply via email to