Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
< ------------ Původní zpráva ------------
< Od: dave <[email protected]>
< Předmět: Re: [64studio-users] Kernel 2.6.26 ... terminal messages
< Datum: 18.1.2009 13:00:41
< ----------------------------------------
< Ralf Mardorf wrote:
< > Folderol wrote:
< > < >> On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:23:55 +0100
< >> Ralf Mardorf <[email protected]> wrote:
< >>
< >> < >> < >>> dave wrote:
< >>> < >>> < >>>> Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
< >>>> < >>>> < >>>>> Hello all,
< >>>>>
< >>>>> I am just curious what these messages in my terminal means
... never
< >>>>> saw something like this before.
< >>>>>
< >>>>> Cheers
< >>>>>
< >>>>> mira
< >>>>>
< >>>>>
< >>>>> Message from sysl...@64studio at Sat Jan 17 05:37:06 2009 ...
< >>>>> 64studio kernel: [27936.103287] Trying to fix it up, but a
reboot is
< >>>>> needed
< >>>>>
< >>>>> Message from sysl...@64studio at Sat Jan 17 05:37:06 2009 ...
< >>>>> 64studio kernel: [27936.103270] page:c14c0770 flags:0x40000000
< >>>>> mapping:c14c0780 mapcount:0 count:0
< >>>>> < >>>>> < >>>>> < >>>> Hi Mira,
< >>>>
< >>>> I am also finding with searches that I'm reading reports
regarding:
< >>>>
< >>>> ram, memory, or Hypertreading doesn't work with all the
Motherboards.
< >>>>
< >>>> Cheers,
< >>>> dave.
< >>>> < >>>> < >>> I might be totally wrong with
reinstalling firefox, but I remember that
< >>> some years ago I often had to reinstall firefox and also to
remove the
< >>> folder for firefox in /home/user, because of some strange
behaviour,
< >>> that seems to be caused by bad hardware (resp. it wasn't clear
what was
< >>> going wrong), but it wasn't the hardware. Anyway, Mira had some
messages
< >>> for firefox too. It can't harm to test it, but I've forgotten
to write,
< >>> that it might be needed to remove the folder in /home/user too.
Doesn't
< >>> had anyone else troubles with firefox?
< >>>
< >>> Mira, do you get those messages, even if firefox isn't running?
< >>>
< >>> < >>> < >> I remember having that problem, but a
very long time ago. Haven't had
< >> it at all with the laster versions of V2 or the newer V3.
< >> < >> < >
< >
< > Yes, a long time ago for me too, that I had those troubles and I
never
< > had it with Iceweasel, it was the "original" Firefox. It also
can't harm
< > to run memtest ;).
< > < < Hi all,
< < Can you remember if you were running a 2.6.26 kernel at the time?
< A lot of the reports mentioned 2.6.26 RT, and included the firefox
error < lines.
< < Cheers,
< dave.
<
Hi all,
I got these messages with 2.6.26-RT and iceweasel 3.0.5
Cheers
mira
Hi,
I am on 2.6.26-RT with Firefox 3.05 (3.0 alpha install). x2 different
computers.
You must be on 2.1 dist-upgraded to 3.0 alpha?
If you try removing Iceweasel as Ralf suggests does it want to take any
64studio packages with it?
I don't have 64studio-skel installed. It's not in the 3.0 alpha install.
If the dist-upgrade removed your 64studio-skel then you could try the
Firefox fix first.
I hope it fixes the problem. It means it's not kernel/hardware related.
My original post = I am *also* finding with searches that I'm reading
reports regarding etc., etc.,
The 2.6.26, RT kernel, ram, memory, Hypertreading & firefox were
mentioned in many of the reports
I read. It would be great news if the firefox fix eliminated
kernel/hardware issues from the problem.
It would also be interesting to know if a clean 3.0 alpha "install" gave
any errors on your machine.
Cheers!
dave.
_______________________________________________
64studio-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
