tim hall wrote: > On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 12:07 +0100, rosea grammostola wrote: > >> tim hall wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 14:47 +0100, rosea grammostola wrote: >>> >>>> Or is it possible to backport the 64studio jaunty-backport kernel to hardy? >>>> >>>> >>> If you need the capabilities of a newer kernel, you should compile your >>> own using the same method and config as Free uses to create the 64 >>> Studio kernel. >>> >>> >> I have the config file, but I don't know the method Free uses to build a >> kernel. I would like to learn it though, the way he builds kernels for >> 64studio (so the kernel works not only on his system, but on 'all') >> > > I'm rather out of the loop on this subject - it's a long time since I > bothered recompiling a kernel. I'm sure there must be a published > procedure about patching a linux kernel for realtime capabilities. There is. But I'm wondering if it's different when I just build for my own system or for 'all' pc's. How do I know which packages I should have installed for the kernel build, to support as much hardware as possible...
\r _______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
