Gustin Johnson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > rosea grammostola wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> After a lit of experimenting in vbox, it seems I bumped up against an >> serious issue :) >> >> libc6-dev from Ubuntu seems to conflict with linux-libc-dev from >> 64studio (jaunty backport) >> >> Need to get 0B/3453kB of archives. >> After this operation, 13.7MB of additional disk space will be used. >> (Reading database ... 164776 files and directories currently installed.) >> Unpacking libc6-dev (from .../libc6-dev_2.9-4ubuntu6.1_i386.deb) ... >> dpkg: error processing >> /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6-dev_2.9-4ubuntu6.1_i386.deb (--unpack): >> trying to overwrite `/usr/include/scsi/scsi.h', which is also in >> package linux-libc-dev >> dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) >> Errors were encountered while processing: >> /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6-dev_2.9-4ubuntu6.1_i386.deb >> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) >> >> >> I don't know if reporting this will helps the devs. I don't know if it's >> 'supposed' to conflict. >> >> > The problem does not occur on a stock 64Studio install. It looks like > the naming nomenclature is different for this package with that > backports repository. Your only real option if you must use 3rd party > repositories is to do something called apt pinning.
I have this also on a stock 64studio install, when I want to build oomidi (openoctave) Writing extended state information... Done (Reading database ... 110539 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libc6-dev (from .../libc6-dev_2.7-10ubuntu5_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6-dev_2.7-10ubuntu5_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/include/scsi/scsi.h', which is also in package linux-libc-dev _______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
