Dear Yong-Geun

I have a comment regarding this draft:

It seems to me that all the use cases presented in the document are for "short-range" technologies, that would easily follow in the PAN category. Although most of the current work done in 6lo concentrates in such technologies, there is no limitation in the scope that indicates that low-power wide area technologies cannot be considered. I'm referring to technologies that were discussed during the LP-WAN BOF (they even have a shared file with an initial list of technologies in goo.gl/S3uSPU <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1n7cXN4_VuI8imy8MG3-fHjl9FNiNvYfdB4txN4hDQ-w/edit#heading=h.g3u16990965f>).

Why aren't we looking into those technologies as 6lo use-cases? I suggest that if not all the technologies, some examples should relate to LP-WAN technologies, since they are also restricted networks (some argue that even more constrained than Low-PAN technologies) and also need IPv6-over-foo definitions.

Looking forward to your opinion.

Regards,
Sandra Céspedes

On 07-04-2016 22:14, Yong-Geun Hong wrote:
Dear Michael.

Thanks for your valuable comments.

I totally agree your comments and it is aligned with other comments in the 6lo WG meeting today.

I will keep in mind your comments and try to revise the document as you pointed.

Best regards.

Yong-Geun.


On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 7:20 AM, Michael Richardson <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


    I scanned the document quickly during the presentation today.

    It seems like it might be a useful document to have;
    I'm thinking that 6lowpan maybe already did such a thing? If so,
    it's old.

    If the purpose is to market/educate outsiders then I see the
    point, and let's
    do that.  We regularily don't explain ourselves well enough.  This
    document
    should be augmented with a set of slides that explain (in
    pictures) the
    deployment scenarios indicated.  I would find that useful when I
    explain
    things to outsiders if I can find pictures and diagrams for
    technologies
    which I'm not otherwise intimate with.

    (If it's just for us, then I don't think it's useful as is)


    --
    Michael Richardson <[email protected]
    <mailto:mcr%[email protected]>>, Sandelman Software Works
     -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-




    _______________________________________________
    6lo mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo




_______________________________________________
6lo mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo


--

Sandra L. Céspedes, Ph.D. | Profesora Asistente
Departamento de Ingeniería Eléctrica
Universidad de Chile
Av. Tupper 2007, Santiago, Chile. 8370451
Tel. +56 (2) 29784093 | Of. 504
URL:http://www.cec.uchile.cl/~scespedes <http://www.cec.uchile.cl/%7Escespedes>



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
6lo mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo

Reply via email to