Comments :
'Introduction' section of this draft indicates a few bullet points on how it might be useful in 802.15.9 and wifi/Ethernet technologies , but it is not clear to me that if this type is now mandatory for other non-802.15.4 L2 technologies as well. Can you please add a section on the document on usage with other L2 technologies? Or is this draft only limited to Wifi/Ethernet technologies? If it applies to other foo L2 technologies, then an explanation is requested as to when to consider adding this "type" in the solution and whether any existing RFCs( bt-le, lowpanz etc.) require any modification. Best regards, -Samita From: Samita Chakrabarti Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 10:07 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: WGLC for draft-ietf-6lo-ethertype-request-00.txt Hello All: The WG Last Call for the following document starts today. Please provide your input on improving the document and comments on proceeding towards the next step. The LC will end on May 4, 2016. Thank you. -Samita & Gabriel > Title : Assignment of an Ethertype for IPv6 with LoWPAN > Encapsulation > Authors : Ralph Droms > Paul Duffy > Filename : draft-ietf-6lo-ethertype-request-00.txt > Pages : 4 > Date : 2016-04-18 > > Abstract: > When carried over layer 2 technologies such as Ethernet, IPv6 > datagrams using LoWPAN encapsulation as defined in RFC 4944 must be > identified so the receiver can correctly interpret the encoded IPv6 > datagram. This document requests the assignment of an Ethertype for > that purpose. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-ethertype-request/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-ethertype-request-00
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
