FYI: Summary of 6lo Applicability document discussion. [ Please see below forwarded message] ================================================
Thanks to Yong-Geun all the WG attendees who were present in the meeting and contributed to the very productive discussion. There was a rough consensus among the attendees at May 19th meeting on the new name of the document aligning with its purpose: “IPv6 over Constrained Node Networks(6lo) Applicability & Use cases” A new revision of the draft will be expected before IETF96. Thanks, -Samita From: Samita Chakrabarti Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 6:57 PM To: 'Yong-Geun Hong' Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Thomas Watteyne ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>); AbdurRashidSangi ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>); Xavier Vilajosana; 최영환; Daniel Migault Subject: RE: 6lo Applicability Document Discussion Thank you Younhwan for taking the notes. ==== As for the summary to WG we can do the following based on the meetings and discussion: Attendees: Samita, Yong-Guen, Thomas, Gomez, Younghwan, rashid, Xavier, Daniel - Yong-Guen's presented an overview, history and quick intro to the I-D, draft-hong-6lo-use-case. Young-Geun requested to get the following questions to be resolved: . what is the main purpose? . title changes to what? . additional sections and parts in doc. · Need to decide on the new title of the draft reflecting purpose and content – Young-Geun to discuss and decide in a group of interested 6lo participants · Should we describe deployment in this document? o Concern over distinguishing itself from existing 6lowpan Usecase RFC o Some folks see value in describing current deployment with figures (Carles, Samita, and previously M. Richardson) o Young-Geun to seek contribution on 6lo deployment high-level diagram, scale, Applications and L2 technolgies o Possible deployment examples: Smart Grid activity in WiSun? 6Tisch area? o However the document’s main focus is on per-L2 technology usage, adaptation parameters · Clarification of the purpose of the document o Informational RFC o Targeting IETF internal WGs and members as well as external SDO contemplating a L3 solution for their respective L2 constrained node networks · Should the document include LPWAN as a usecase? [ IETF95 comments from Sandra ] o 6lowpan can be used definitely on LPWAN with some modification but the consensus in the team is to wait until LPWAN BOF next time o Wait until later revision of the document · What about Security requirement of the usecase scenarios? o Should this be considered for each usecase or in general ? o Young-Geun has taken this as an AI == Please check and let me know if any summary point is missing. After that I can post the summary in the mailing list. Thanks, -Samita
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
