Robert Moskowitz <[email protected]> wrote: > If the transition can be augmented by an ephemeral public key, and > some parameters, perhaps, in dhcpv6, this could work as you indicated > in a safe manner.
If we are doing per-link keying, and we transition our address, and we can propogate the L2-security upwards, then I agree that this transition could be secured. I'm still thinking that we might need a L3-RPL level signal which would be secured. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
