Hi Kathleen, Thanks for your review. I have addressed the comments from Simon in a separate response today.
Best regards, Jens -----Original Message----- From: Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 14. december 2016 04:09 To: The IESG <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; Samita Chakrabarti <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-dect-ule-08: (with COMMENT) Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-6lo-dect-ule-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-dect-ule/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I support Alissa's comment on privacy The SecDir review didn't get a response as far as I can tell. Simon had a question and a nit. I think the draft is okay on those points, but a response for the review would be good. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/3E1g-Ccfeq6U0fWcxc5kQ3FL_3w _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
