Hi Alia, Thanks for your review. Comments inline...
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Alia Atlas <[email protected]> wrote: > Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > In Appendix B, given that there is code, it would be good to specifically > mark it as such. As I recall, there are different copyright aspects to > the code fragments in an RFC than to the text. I believe that > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/copyright.html provides pointers to > the implications and encourages marking the code segments with > <CODE_BEGINS> and <CODE_ENDS>. > > > Done. Thanks again, Kerry
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
