Hello Rahul : You are right, all this went down the sink with the RPL reference to the path lifetime operation.
I’ll add text extracted from RPL to explain the TID behvoour and make the specification self-contained as discussed at the WG meeting, unless someone shows up now on the list arguing we should do otherwise. Thanks for the heads up! Take care, Pascal From: 6lo [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rahul Jadhav Sent: mercredi 19 juillet 2017 16:22 To: lo <[email protected]> Subject: [6lo] rgding 6775-update/EARO Hello Pascal, This is the same query as what i raised during the 6lo session. Like it was pointed out, better to take it on ML. The new mechanism described in the draft allows a proxy registration on behalf of the "target node" using EARO. My question is: Will de-registration be possible for such targets, especially considering that state information (in the form of TID) is maintained for such registrations? It will be helpful to clarify in the document. Thanks, Rahul
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
