On Feb 26, 2018, at 18:22, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes Carsten, > > I agree there's a confusion that we need to clean up on the ROLL side. My > definition of leaf echoes yours from RFC 6550. A leaf still understands RPL. > But over time people started using the term as a plain host attached to a RPL > router but that does not know about RPL at all.
They should read RFC 6550 then :-) (Maybe calling them “leaves” in RFC6550 wasn’t so bright, but that’s water under the bridge.) > This is why in my draft I called them "unaware leaves" but in fact they are > plain hosts. I’d be happy with a better term. I think “host” is the best term we have for non-router nodes in the IETF. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
