Hi Pascal, > On Feb 26, 2018, at 19:00, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[email protected]> > wrote: > > For backwards compatibility we need to be able to live without 6CIO.
Please explain. > Still 6CIO seems to be a good mechanism to generalize and that’s why we used > it. Yes. > So should we keep the CIO mechanism, or should we drop it? Putting flags in MBZ fields typically has worse backwards compatibility than adding options (such as 6CIO). But maybe I’m not quite following. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
