Hello Mirja: Thanks a bunch for your review! Let's see below:
> -----Original Message----- > From: 6lo <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Mirja Kühlewind > Sent: mercredi 4 avril 2018 14:42 > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; draft-ietf-6lo- > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: [6lo] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on > draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update- > 17: (with COMMENT) > > Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update-17: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory > paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I believe this document would have been easier to read for me if section 6 > would have been before section 4; however, I guess that's a matter of taste. [PT>] You made me think. Some text is in place for historic reasons but overgrew over time. Section 5 was really about updating RFC 7400. After a suggested renaming, I found it made more sense to move it in the backward compatibility section. Then I looked at section 6 and found no objection moving it up. If that makes life easier for the reader, so be it : ) One thing leading to another I found some duplication between ex section 5 and 6 that I eliminated with a minimum restructuring. I hope the result is more readable :) > > On the TID in section 6.1: Should this field be zero if the T flag is not set? > I guess you should at least say that the field should be ignored if the T > flag is > not set. > [PT>] Sure, I added that text there and in the EARO section as well. It is all now section 4. Many thanks! Take care, Pascal > _______________________________________________ > 6lo mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
