> On Apr 4, 2018, at 11:07 AM, Ben Campbell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Apr 4, 2018, at 1:23 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Hello Ben; >> >> The down reference issues were added as part of the IESG review; the refs >> were informative before but it was pointed that since they were referenced >> in the terminology this made them normative. CC’ing Adrian. >> >> Can we live with it? >> > > Theoretically any normative downrefs should have been mentioned in the IETF > last call announcement. Since these were added after LC, it’s up to Suresh to > decide whether the LC needs to be repeated. (I don’t necessarily think it > does; I’m just pointing out the fact that they exist.)
Thanks Ben. I am torn as well. I personally don’t think the terminology related references have to be normative as someone does not need to read the whole referenced (terminology related) document to understand and implement this one. Adrian, your thoughts? Regards Suresh _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
