Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote:
>> As for the document. I want to suggest that the WG adopt it.
> Hmm. While the document has some interesting observations, I don’t
> think we should adopt any one of its conclusions. The interop problems
> we are seeing in the research implementations are mostly coming from
> the fact that interop simply was not an objective in many of the
> research activities that led to those implementations.
Some argue that IPv4 was the research version of the Internet.
That's why we should adopt the document, so that we can discuss things like
whether we need more variants...
> Adding more
> variants of 6LoWPAN to the mix is NOT going to help with that.
or probably *FEWER* variants.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
_______________________________________________
6lo mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
