Hello folks,
The following discussion describes some issues that need resolution so
that a draft revision can be produced and considered for Last Call.
On 1/2/2019 3:33 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:
Le 2 janv. 2019 à 00:16, Charlie Perkins
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
a écrit :
I think there are a few technical issues needing resolution.
....
*
* In section 6, specification is needed for the backoff algorithm
Ok
*
* In section 6.1, it seems to me that the first 6BBR ought to be
primary, not the 6BBR with the highest address.
We need to agree on the list.
*
* In section 6.2, third bullet, the second sentence refers to
Identical registrations that are not identical. I am not sure
exactly what was meant by the second sentence (different IP
header??).
We need to clarify. Identical is used for same registered address,
possibly different registered nodes.
It needs to be specified how the same registered address can be used by
different registered nodes.
*
Aside from the above, there is a major editorial need for
explanations to follow Figures 2 and 3. If you would be willing to
provide detailed text to describe the signaling depicted in the
figures, that would save a lot of time. The best would be to number
the rungs of the ladder and provide some short explanatory text for
each rung.
Yes
In the meantime I will begin with the other editorial revisions to
the document and await your reply.
Happy New Year!
Charlie P.
Same to you all!
Pascal
Happy New Year to all!
Charlie P.
_______________________________________________
6lo mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
