Hi all, I read the draft and I think this is an important work particularly to extend RFC 7668 from its existing star topology. I have the following comments:
* In several places, the phrase "IPv6 over mesh networks composed of BLE links" is used. In others, the phrase "IPv6 mesh over Bluetooth LE" is used, while I also discovered "IPv6-enabled mesh of Bluetooth LE links". I think the authors should settle on one phrase (my preference would be "IPv6 mesh over BLE links") to avoid confusion that the draft is about deploying IPv6 over the recently standardised BLE mesh technology. * Section 1 has the following sentence: "However, subsequent Bluetooth specifications allow the formation of extended topologies [BTCorev4.1], such as the mesh topology." What extended topologies from the BT Core document are relevant for the mesh described in this document, which didn't exist when RFC 7668 became available? If none, I suggest removing this sentence (and perhaps avoiding the issue mentioned in the next bullet point). * Bluetooth SIG deprecated the Bluetooth Core Specification 4.1 mentioned in the previous point was very recently (actually, yesterday). Perhaps this should be taken into account? Otherwise the draft is in good shape and is ready for submission to IESG. Best regards, Bill _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
