Looks good! A couple of trivial comments:
(1) https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-01#section-2.2 > Assuming 1 kB reassembly > buffers, typical nodes only have enough memory for 1-3 reassembly > buffers. Here, "Assuming a 1kB reassembly buffer"? (singular) (2) https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-01#section-7 These two drafts has newer versions: > [I-D.ietf-lwig-6lowpan-virtual-reassembly] > [I-D.thubert-6lo-fragment-recovery] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-6lowpan-virtual-reassembly-01 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery-02 Best, Yatch > On Apr 24, 2019, at 10:54, Carles Gomez Montenegro <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Dear 6lo WG, > > Authors of draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-01 expressed in IETF 104 that > they believe that the document is ready for WGLC. No comments or > objections were made in this regard. > > Therefore, this email starts a WGLC for draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-01: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-01 > > The WGLC will end on Wednesday, 8th of May. > > Please provide your feedback on the document on the mailing list, even if > it is just a short "looks good" statement. > > Thank you in advance. > > Cheers, > > Shwetha and Carles > > _______________________________________________ > 6lo mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
