On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 3:05 PM Pascal Thubert (pthubert) < [email protected]> wrote:
> Dear all: > > * During the review by Laurent, a question came up on we could change > the fragment size when transmitting a datagram. As it goes we can, because > the offset and size are indicated in each fragment. If the MTU goes down > and a fragment must be resend, we can also resend a smaller piece with the > original fragment sequence and send other fragments with unused sequences > for the rest of the original fragment. This is made possible because the > sequence is sequential in the bitmap but not in the order of fragments. > That being said, a reaction to an ECN is to reduce the window. At the same > time a node could also reduce the datagram size and enable a more > streamlined transmission for all. What do you all think? * > I think we should not change size to smaller when transmitting, but if needed it must be limited for special cases. AB > * Pascal * > > > > > * _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list > [email protected] <[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo> *
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
