Hello Spencer and all, Thanks for your valuable reviews. Please find my answers inline.
BRs, Younghwan Choi > -----Original Message----- > From: Spencer Dawkins via Datatracker <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 4:30 AM > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Carles Gomez <[email protected]>; > Samita Chakrabarti <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-13: (with > COMMENT) > > Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-13: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-nfc/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I support Alissa's second Discuss point about the plan for fragmentation > interoperation, and her third Discuss point about connecting unsuspecting > devices to the Internet :-) Agreed. I also gave the answers for the same as Benjamin's DISCUSS and Alissa' DISCUSS. IPv6-over-NFC is restricted to NFC devices that support MUIX in the final draft. Please refer to the answers about Benjamin's DISCUSS. > > Other people have said this, but requiring MIUX would be awesome. > _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
