On Jul 19, 2019, at 17:33, Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jul 19, 2019, at 17:08, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Actually we use the term Low Power Lossy Network beyond 6lo, e.g., in ROLL. >> I'd rather keep the term but certainly expand it on first use. > > I’d rather get rid of it.
The document is about 6LoWPAN/6lo and its way to fragment packets. You don’t have to run RPL to use fragment forwarding. RFC 7102 specifically says its terminology is for ROLL work, so I won’t say anything about using that there, but it is not very accurate otherwise. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
