On 22-Jul-19 10:10, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:
> Hello Brian
>
> You may like RFC 6282, RFC 8138 or SCHC from LPWAN
Hi, yes, we mention the contrast with of 6282, and we should probably add 8138
there. I think the approach is rather orthogonal to CoAP/SCHC, but we should
discuss that.
Thanks
Brian
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Pascal
>
>> Le 21 juil. 2019 à 16:44, Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> a
>> écrit :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wednesday July 24 morning, from 08:30 to 09:45, in room Notre Dame,
>> we'll introduce and discuss two new drafts:
>>
>> Asymmetric IPv6, https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-asymmetric-ipv6
>>
>> A new approach to IPv6 header compression for scenarios where minimum packet
>> size and minimum routing cost are both important. (This will also be briefly
>> presented in 6lo on Monday.)
>>
>> Service Oriented IP,
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-service-oriented-ip
>>
>> A backwards-compatible approach to forwarding where the service required
>> rather than the IP address is used for routing the packet.
>>
>> Our main objective is to get your feedback.
>>
>> Regards
>> Sheng Jiang, Brian Carpenter, Guangpeng Li
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 6lo mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
_______________________________________________
6lo mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
