Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-6lo-ap-nd-15: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-ap-nd/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work put into this document. I found the document easy to read. I am clearing my previous DISCUSS and removing some COMMENTs based on proposed text by the authors. I hope that this helps to improve the document, Regards, -éric -- Section 4.2 -- While status is set to 0 when sending a NS, what is the expected behavior of a receiver ? -- References -- Is there a reason why the crypto algorithms RFC 7748 and 8032 are not normative? == NITS == -- Section 6 -- s/may use a same Crypto-ID/may use the same Crypto-ID/ ? _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
