Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-6lo-ap-nd-18: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-ap-nd/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I support Ben Kaduk’s DISCUSS position. Thank you for this well written document. A few nits as the key issues already appear to be covered in other ballots: ** Section 4.1. Typo. s/acertained/ascertained/ ** Section 4.3. Per “The type of cryptographic algorithm used in calculation Crypto-ID (see Table 2 in Section 8.3 ).”, why not reference the sub-registry – “subregistry "Crypto-Type Subregistry" in the Internet Control Message Protocol version 6 (ICMPv6) Parameters"? ** Section 4.4. In the description of the Digital Signature field, consider adding that the length of this variable length field is determined by the algorithm: OLD: The computation of the digital signature depends on the Crypto-Type which is found in the associated CIPO. NEW: The length and computation of the digital signature depends on the Crypto-Type which is found in the associated CIPO. ** Section 4.4. Typo. s/ths/this/ _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
