Hello Barry: > > >> This specification uses the following terms: > >> > >> I would say it “defines” these terms, no? > > > > Not really, they appear in RFC 4944, but ok > > OK, no... I hadn't realized (and didn't check) that they were defined in 4944. > Sorry; leave as is.
Will roll back with next publication, no problem Again, many thanks Barry! Pascal _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
