Many thanks for reviewing this doc Roman! We debated with Barry and concluded that the references you mentioned should stay non normative. One is abandoned and the other would be a downref.
Is it ok to stick with this? Pascal > Le 17 févr. 2020 à 00:18, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <[email protected]> a > écrit : > > Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-12: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thank you for this easy to read document and the work to produce it. > > Concur with Barry that [FRAG-ILE] and [LWIG-VRB] should be normative. > > _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
