Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-6lo-ap-nd-20: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-ap-nd/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for addressing my last Discuss point! It's interesting that COSE has us say what key type to use with a given curve but JOSE doesn't have that in the registry, even though it is still a relevant question. I think we can trust [CURVE-REPRESENTATIONS] to cover that topic, though. I gave some brief thought to whether the usage of [CURVE-REPRESENTATIONS] as the reference for the registry entries requires listing it as a normative reference for this document, and decided that the current (informative) status is tolerable. _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
