Hi, I have reviewed the changes from 02 to 03. I had suggested that the term PLC Device be used consistently, and I see that. At the end of the first paragraph of 3.2, "PANC" is used which surprised me, but I see it in the glossary. I'm not sure if you want to add "JRC" to the list of aliases for PANC.
Thank you for mentioning 6tisch-minimal-security. There is also a BRSKI-like 6tisch mechanism that uses IDevID. Is it the case that the PLC devices can have no L2 security as an option? I believe that you may wish to outlaw that situation. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
