Hello Robert,

Thank you for your comments. Please find my response inline.

I will fix the typos you mentioned in another mail.

Best regards,
Remy

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Robert Sparks via Datatracker [mailto:[email protected]] 
发送时间: 2021年7月24日 2:42
收件人: [email protected]
抄送: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
主题: Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6lo-plc-06

Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Has Nits

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing 
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments 
were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document 
editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call 
comments.

This document is basically ready, but has nits that should be addressed before 
publication as Proposed Standard RFC.

Context for the ADs, from my LC review:

> This document's primary point is to standardize mappings of ipv6 
> identifiers
for using ipv6 over IEEE 1901.1, 1901.2, and IT-T G.9903 networks. > Those 
standards are not publicy available, and I have not reviewed how these mappings 
and the security mechanisms in those protocols interact.

My LC review suggested removing section 5 - Remy's response was that he would 
check with the WG. I don't find any discussion of that on the WG list? I still 
think it could be removed or moved to a separate document.
[Remy] I've checked with the WG in IETF110. The WG suggests to keep the 
section. Please verify it in the minutes.

My other comments have been addressed.

This version introduces a few editorial nits that I will send directly to the 
editors.


_______________________________________________
6lo mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo

Reply via email to