All,
I've been trying to catch up on and close all outside INT area errata. In
so doing, I've come across:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4814
filed against RFC 6282.
My inclination is to reject this erratum, since 255 is in fact "used to
verify that a communication occurs over a single-hop", and this sentence
provides some background for the document treating 255 later on (section
3.1.1).
If anyone feels I've misread or misunderstood something do let me know.
Thanks,
-Erik
_______________________________________________
6lo mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
