On 2021-12-14, at 10:09, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote: > > While we believe that the document is becoming mature, we still welcome any > feedback people can send us.
I haven’t read the new version, but I stick with the observation that the problem/opportunity addressed is already solved with 6lo header compression (and will be more so once we have SCHC header compression in 6lo), and NSA does not have the same desirable properties with respect to preserving IPv6 semantics that the header compression solutions have. Right now, I would like us to focus on making the SCHC solution really good. In the end, that may not look very different on the wire from NSA (as far as addresses are concerned — SCHC of course can do more). Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
