Dear Zaheduzzaman Sarker. Thanks for your valuable comments and sorry for the late response.
To resolve your comments, I updated the draft. Please, find inline responses. And, I submitted the revision draft based on your comments. https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-15.html It is appreciated to check again and let me know any missing points. Best regards. Yong-Geun. 2022년 12월 15일 (목) 오후 7:25, Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker < [email protected]>님이 작성: > Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-14: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks for working on this document. This was a good read for me. > > #Comments > > - The comparison table in section 2.7 seems nice one, however, as there > is no > description given on how to interpret the Low or Moderate, frequent or > infrequent. It kind of fails to provided the intended comparison. Like > the > scale is not YES and NO which cloud be easily interpreted, but No, Low, > Moderate, High and perhaps Yes. If there is such scale already available > in > RFC or other documents would be nice to provide references. > [Hong] Based on RFC 8578, I update the expression : No -> No, Low, Moderate, High -> Yes > > - There are terms used like 4G, LTE in this document, I don't think those > need to be that much of generation specific and could easily be replaces > by > "cellular" unless we see an need to mention a particular cellular access > generation for some specific reasons. > [Hong] Replace 4G, LTE -> cellular > > - > > > >
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
