Hello Michael:

> 
> I agree that we need a specification. But, I think don't think either of the
> documents you cited contain that what we need.
> Or maybe, I have mis-understood.
> 

Agreed on all. This is why I'm asking reviews for 
draft-thubert-6lo-prefix-registration, which aims at providing that missing 
link.

I guess that was missing in the text of the mail (though it was the title). 
Sorry for that!

So yes, reviews of draft-thubert-6lo-prefix-registration would be very welcome!

Pascal




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 1:35 PM
> To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthub...@cisco.com>; 6lo@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [6lo] towards adoption of draft-thubert-6lo-prefix-registration
> 
> 
> Pascal Thubert \(pthubert\) <pthubert=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>     > At the moment there is magic (read proprietary code) that ties, say,
>     > the DHCP server that delegates a prefix and the routers that install a
>     > route for the delegated prefix via the delegated node. With this draft,
>     > the delegated node can advertise the prefix to the routers in a
>     > standard/interoperable fashion.
> 
> Yes, the DHCP relay has to snoop the replies.
> I've complained about this at DHCwg some years ago in the past, and been told
> that vendors X,Y,Z already have snooping code, and it would take so long to
> deploy new things, so what would be the point.
> 
> I disagree: had we done this ages ago, today, we would have working code.
> 
>     > Bottom line is that it is getting more urgent to complete the work and
>     > I intend to ask for adoption at IETF 117.
> 
>     > To progress on this, reviews would be much appreciated between now and
>     > the next IETF.
> 
> I agree that we need a specification. But, I think don't think either of the
> documents you cited contain that what we need.
> Or maybe, I have mis-understood.
> 
> (Waiting for Ole to say "OSPF"... and there are some arguments for doing it
> this way, and it would be nice to figure out what's in the way here)
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>            Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
6lo mailing list
6lo@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo

Reply via email to