Carles Gomez Montenegro <[email protected]> wrote: > 1. Generic vs IEEE 802.15.4-specific document
...
> We (authors) followed the current IEEE 802.15.4-specific approach as it
> seemed more straightforward, and focusing on IEEE 802.15.4 entailed
> interesting opportunities. Coincidentally, this approach is similar to
Are you writing to enable SCHC over *802.15.4* radios, or any network which
happens to use 6lo compression techniques? e.g. DECT, G.99, PLC, ??
Do you expect SCHC frames to co-exist with 6lo frames?
(It sounds like it uses 6lo code pages, etc)
> - The document uses only the SCHC header compression component (i.e.,
> 6LoWPAN/6lo functionality is used for fragmentation).
> Thoughts? Would you have any particular preference on this matter?
i think the answer should be driven by input from those who might want to use
this on other media. What do they want, if anything.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
