Hi All, We submitted a new revision of the PASA reliability document. In particular the text concerning the single address solution has been revised hopefully making it clearer.
As usual any feedback is welcome. Ciao L. > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, 8 September 2023 09:26 > To: Zhe Lou <[email protected]>; Liguangpeng (Roc, Network Technology > Laboratory) <[email protected]>; Luigi IANNONE > <[email protected]>; Zhe Lou <[email protected]> > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-li-6lo-pasa-reliability-02.txt > > A new version of Internet-Draft draft-li-6lo-pasa-reliability-02.txt has been > successfully submitted by Luigi Iannone and posted to the IETF repository. > > Name: draft-li-6lo-pasa-reliability > Revision: 02 > Title: Reliability Considerations of Path-Aware Semantic Addressing > Date: 2023-09-08 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 25 > URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-li-6lo-pasa-reliability-02.txt > Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-6lo-pasa-reliability/ > HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-6lo-pasa-reliability > Diff: > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-li-6lo-pasa-reliability-02 > > Abstract: > > Path-Aware Semantic Address (PASA) > [I-D.li-6lo-path-aware-semantic-addressing]), proposes to > algorithmically assign addresses to nodes in a 6lo environment so to > achieve stateless forwarding, hence, allowing to avoid using a > routing protocol. PASA is more suitable for stable and static > wireline connectivity, in order to avoid renumbering due to topology > changes. Even in such kind of scenarios, reliability remains a > concern. This memo tackles specifically reliability in PASA > deployments, analyzing possible broad solution categories to solve > the issue. > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
