Gabrel, 

> 9.1.  Alternatives for Delivery of Frames in a Mesh
> 
>    Before discussing the defined mechanism for delivery in a mesh, let's
>    review some options on how to accomplish this.  The final destination
>    could be expressed either as a layer 2 or as an IP (layer 3) address.
>    In the latter case, there would be no need to provide any additional
>    header support in this document (i.e., at the sub-IP layer).  The
>    link-layer destination address would point to the next hop
>    destination address while the IP destination address would point to
>    the final destination (IP) address (that may be multiple hops away
>    from the source).  Thus, while forwarding data, the single-hop
>    destination address would change at each hop (always pointing to the
>    "best" next link-layer hop), while the destination IP address would
>    remain unchanged.  Notice that if an IP packet is fragmented, the
>    individual fragments may arrive at any node out of order.  If so, if
>    the initial frament (which contains the IP header) is delayed for
>    some reason, a node that receives a middle fragment would lack the
>    final destination address.  It would be forced to wait until this
>    information arrives (in the IP header within the first fragment)
>    before being able to forward the fragment any further.  This imposes
>    some additional buffering requirements on intermediate nodes.
>    Additionally, the above scheme would need to be adapted depending on
>    the layer 3 protocol, and would require this protocol to include its
>    own addressing information.

Additional buffering and final destination field always-on seem a bit trafoff. 
If all fragment packet includes final destination field, packet size is a bit 
increased (24bits if S is set or 72bits). Intermediate nodes, however, don't 
need any additional buffering. Increasd packet size above seems not too much 
big in my understanding. So,  I think we should clarify this concern in above 
sentence...


Regards,

Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
Mobile Platform Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics.

_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

Reply via email to