Lowpanners,

today we had a bad case of agenda overflow.
While we managed to cover all items that are immediately related to our chartered work, there is some interesting input on future work that we couldn't look at:

Routing protocol comparison (Kim/Park, 15 min)
        draft-daniel-6lowpan-load-adhoc-routing
        draft-montenegro-6lowpan-dymo-low-routing

6lowpan Evaluation results (Kim/Park, 15 min)
        draft-daniel-6lowpan-load-adhoc-routing
        draft-daniel-6lowpan-hilow-hierarchical-routing
        draft-daniel-6lowpan-sslp
        draft-daniel-6lowpan-interoperability

The slides are already at the meeting materials site, https:// onsite.ietf.org/public/meeting_materials.cgi?meeting_num=64, item "routing protocols comparison" (direct link is right now: http:// onsite.ietf.org/proceedings/05nov/slides/6lowpan-3.pdf).

Pending AD approval (which I herewith request), a couple of lowpanners interested in this will meet Tuesday at 8 am sharp in room Cypress to look at this presentation. We have until 8:30, at which time we have to make room for the SASL WG meeting.

Also, I would like to report that we had a quite productive hallway meeting on the security considerations section of the problem statement document, and Nandu is planning to submit an updated version to the mailing list Tuesday by 5pm. Some of us will meet in the lobby area at 8 am Wednesday to discuss this some more.

Gruesse, Carsten


_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

Reply via email to