The lack of minutes is probably my fault. I dropped the ball.
Yes Carsten created a very good list of rechartering items with names by
the items. I was hoping that it was on the wiki, but it doesn't seem to
be there yet. If Carsten will forward it I will incorporate it in to
the meeting minutes and we can get on with that discussion.
Are there any comments on "problem statement" document?
geoff
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 10:58 +0900, Ki-Hyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> I am curious why the official minutes are not available yet, but there
> were such items we had mentioned.
>
> Anyway, the following items were discussed and summarized by Carsten(?
> If my memory is correct) as rechartering items on the last interim
> meeting.
>
>
>
> 1) Mesh routing protocol
>
> 2) Service discovery
>
> 3) Scalability of 6lowpan (routing and addressing)
>
> 4) Mobility issues
>
> 5) Naming service for mesh layer
>
> 6) Gateway architecture (This item was discussed as “HC compression”
> on the last meeting)
>
>
>
> If you need polished statements for these items, let me know.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> --
>
> Ki-Hyung Kim
>
> Associate Professor
>
> Division of Information and Computer Engineering,
>
> Ajou University, Suwon, Korea 442-749
>
> Tel: +82-31-219-2433, Cel: +82-17-760-2551, Fax: +82-31-219-2433
>
> http://ilab.ajou.ac.kr/kkim86/index.htm
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> From:Schumacher Christian Peter Pii [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 10:06 PM
> To: Ki-Hyung Kim
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [6lowpan] new 6lowpan charter
>
>
>
>
> Hi Kim
>
>
>
> Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be any official minutes from the
> interim meeting in January, and I assumed we only wanted to focus on a
> few of these points. However, if you could provide some key-words for
> these other items you mentioned, I would be happy to incorporate them
> into the text.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Christian
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> From:Ki-Hyung Kim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 7. marts 2006 13:57
> To: Schumacher Christian Peter Pii
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [6lowpan] new 6lowpan charter
>
> Hi, Schumacher,
>
>
>
> As I remember, there were some additional rechartering items which we
> had reached on consensus in the last interim meeting, such as mesh
> routing protocols, service discovery, scalability (routing and
> addressing) and management.
>
>
>
> Is there anything I don’t know during the time or any reason why we
> can’t move forward on these issues?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Ki-Hyung Kim
>
> Associate Professor
>
> Division of Information and Computer Engineering,
>
> Ajou University, Suwon, Korea 442-749
>
> Tel: +82-31-219-2433, Cel: +82-17-760-2551, Fax: +82-31-219-2433
>
> http://ilab.ajou.ac.kr/kkim86/index.htm
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> From:Schumacher Christian Peter Pii [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 8:09 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [6lowpan] new 6lowpan charter
>
>
>
>
> Hi.
>
> During the 6lowpan interim meeting in January, the working group
> discussed possible topics for a future rechartering of 6lowpan. Based
> on available information from that meeting I've compiled the following
> text, which is an edited version of the scope present in the current
> 6lowpan charter. Feedback is appreciated.
>
> --- start of scope ---
>
> Scope of 6lowpan:
>
> Produce "Optimization of the Neighbor Discovery Protocol for
> 6lowpans"
> to define how to apply the existing Neighbor Discovery protocol in a
> 6lowpan.
>
> Produce "IPv6 over Low Power WPAN Security Analysis" to define the
> assumptions for a security model for 6lowpan. This includes analysis
> of threats, identify types of devices and define the levels of trust
> between these devices.
>
> Produce "6lowpan Co-existence with other Networks" to define how to
> co-exist with other networks. This includes analysis of how to
> survive
> interference caused by IEEE 802.11 based networks, and investigate how
> to
> recognize and co-exist with other networks based on IEEE 802.15.4.
>
> As such, the working group may also work on an informational document
> to show how to apply an existing MANET protocol to LoWPANs (e.g.,
> AODV, OLSR, DYMO, etc).
>
> The working group will reuse existing specifications whenever
> reasonable and possible.
>
> The working group will also serve as a venue for ongoing discussions
> on other topics related to the more complete list outlined above.
> Additional related milestones may be added in the future via a
> rechartering operation.
>
> Note: As may be obvious from its official name above, this particular
> working group will not work on IPv4 over IEEE 802.15.4
> specifications.
> Given the limitations of the target devices, dual-stack deployments
> are not practical. Because of its higher potential for header
> compression, its support for the huge number of devices expected and
> of cleanly built-in features such as address autoconfiguration, IPv6
> is the exclusive focus of the working group.
>
> --- end of scope ---
>
> Looking forward to receive your feedback.
>
> Regards
> Christian
>
> PS: The original charter can be found at
> http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/6lowpan-charter.html
>
>
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
