Carsten/Geoff, >From the perspective of a new member to the group, I was wondering why the "Gateway architecture between 6LoWPAN and IPv6 networks" is not being given priority in the current rechartering... I would think this is important since no 6LoWPAN network is going to be a standalone network.
Additionally, I would suggest that the group also consider a gateway architecture between 6LoWPAN and an IPv4 network, due to the preponderance of IPv4 in the short term. I am not suggesting that any flavor of IPv4 be used inside the 6LoWPAN, but it would be useful to consider connecting to such a network. What does the group have to say? Thanks, Rahul Shah. -----Original Message----- From: Carsten Bormann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 12:56 PM To: Schumacher Christian Peter Pii Cc: Carsten Bormann; [email protected] Subject: Re: [6lowpan] friday's agenda On Mar 19 2006, at 17:01, Christian Schumacher wrote: > Carsten and Geoff, what is the status of the official agenda for > 6lowpan WG meeting on friday? Well, I think that status is called "very very late" in English... An initial draft of the agenda is at http://6lowpan.tzi.org/6lowpan_20at_20IETF_2065 Please also follow the "recharter" link and send comments on the draft charter to this list. There are names of possible contributors in the proposed charter -- these are not meant to be exclusive, and we would like to hear which ones of the potential charter items each of you wants to work on. Apart from the Friday WG meeting, we plan to have a 6lowpan dinner on Thursday (after the plenary) -- please RSVP to Christian if you want to participate. Gruesse, Carsten _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
