I agree with Gabriel. We should not meet if there is not much to do/not
enough attendance is expected, etc. I think that not many people were
happy with the last interim.
Regards,
Behcet
gabriel montenegro wrote:
Why is an interim needed?
What would be the agenda and desired outcome of this meeting?
What do we need to get done before we're ready for such a meeting?
I'd vote for Jacksonville, but really, without a clearer idea of the above I'd be unable
to justify this expense in time and money.
-gabriel
--- Schumacher Christian Peter Pii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear 6lowpanners
There has been suggested the following locations for a 2-day interim
meeting:
- Europe:
Danfoss A/S, Denmark
TZI, Germany
- Canada:
In connection with WiMAX F2F meeting in Ottawa, May 23-25
- USA:
In connection (possibly May 11-12) with IEEE 802 Interim in
Jacksonville, May14-19
Please reply your preference to this mail and CC the mailing list, so we
can determine the overall preference.
Deadline for this poll is Friday 7th of April.
Regards
Christian Schumacher
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
|
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
