Hi Christian, I also believe that we had a very productive interim meeting last time and we need another chance of communication (off-site or teleconference) before next IETF.
I prefer to have an off-site interim, but teleconference is OK too if we don't have enough time to prepare it. My preferred time of teleconference is 17:00 ~ 20:00 PDT. (which is 9:00 ~ 12:00 in Korea local time). -- Ki-Hyung Kim Associate Professor Division of Information and Computer Eng., Ajou University, Suwon, Korea 442-749 Tel: +82-31-219-2433, Cel: +82-17-760-2551, Fax: +82-31-219-2433 http://www.6lowpan.org http://ilab.ajou.ac.kr/kkim86/index.htm -----Original Message----- From: Schumacher Christian Peter Pii [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 5:40 PM To: 6lowpan Subject: FW: [6lowpan] poll for interim meeting locations Dear all. Gabriel pointed out in a previous mail, that it might be a good idea to give teleconferencing a shot. How many are interested in this? Please list preferred weekday and time (in GMT). Regards Christian -----Original Message----- From: gabriel montenegro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31. marts 2006 00:30 To: Geoff Mulligan; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 6lowpan Subject: Re: [6lowpan] poll for interim meeting locations Just to clarify: I think the interim we had was very productive and wish we had had more time. I'm one of the happy ones. And if it makes sense, I'm all for having another productive one (as per the subject line in this message). All I'm saying is that every interim/meeting is an expense in time and money, and it's good to have as much info in advance in order to weigh the priorities with other commitments. Things like teleconferences are used regularly in IEEE or other venues, and that's perhaps something to explore as well. -gabriel --- Geoff Mulligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While a do agree that we should not meet if we do not have clear agenda > and take exception to your characterization that people were not happy > with the last interim. > > Everyone that I have spoken with were pleased with the progress that we > made and the topics covered at the interim and felt that it was very > productive and useful. > > If that is not the case, please speak up. > > geoff > > On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 10:06 -0800, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: > > I agree with Gabriel. We should not meet if there is not much to > > do/not enough attendance is expected, etc. I think that not many > > people were happy with the last interim. > > > > Regards, > > > > Behcet > > > > gabriel montenegro wrote: > > > Why is an interim needed? > > > What would be the agenda and desired outcome of this meeting? > > > What do we need to get done before we're ready for such a meeting? > > > > > > I'd vote for Jacksonville, but really, without a clearer idea of the above I'd be > unable > > > to justify this expense in time and money. > > > > > > -gabriel > > > > > > --- Schumacher Christian Peter Pii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear 6lowpanners > > > > > > > > There has been suggested the following locations for a 2-day interim > > > > meeting: > > > > > > > > - Europe: > > > > Danfoss A/S, Denmark > > > > TZI, Germany > > > > - Canada: > > > > In connection with WiMAX F2F meeting in Ottawa, May 23-25 > > > > - USA: > > > > In connection (possibly May 11-12) with IEEE 802 Interim in > > > > Jacksonville, May14-19 > > > > > > > > Please reply your preference to this mail and CC the mailing list, so we > > > > can determine the overall preference. > > > > > > > > Deadline for this poll is Friday 7th of April. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > Christian Schumacher > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > 6lowpan mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > 6lowpan mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > 6lowpan mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
