Just to be clear. The version of the ID sent by Geoff in the previous message was
a proposal as to how to accomodate the suggested changes. It has not yet been
submitted to the I-D repository. I'll do that tomororrow Tuesday, just to have one more
day for folks to look it over.
The changes were:
Section 3 added the word "may" in this sentence:
"FFDs will typically have more resources and may be mains
powered. "
powered. "
New bullet 4 in section 4.2:
4. Support for network topologies in which either FFDs or RFDs may
be battery or mains-powered. This implies the appropriate
considerations for routing in the presence of sleeping nodes.
be battery or mains-powered. This implies the appropriate
considerations for routing in the presence of sleeping nodes.
-gabriel
Geoff Mulligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here is the updated problem statement. The changes are to include the
requirement to support mains and battery powered networks.
Thanks Gabriel.
geoff
_______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
