6lowpanners. I've made an editorial update of the problem document based on post-Last-Call comments and put the it on the wiki (6lowpan.tzi.org).
I would to like emphasize that this is only an editorial update and hopefully shouldn't void conesensus. Regards Christian -----Original Message----- From: Soohong Daniel Park [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 8. november 2006 19:46 To: Carsten Bormann Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [6lowpan] Problem Statement Comments Just catching up with the sentence below: > (Chair hat on.) > I would prefer to do this in a way that does not require a new WGLC > (i.e., editorial only). Don't need to solicit a new WGLC. IESG will solicit IETF LC on the IETF announcement, then we will be able to speak up if some issues happen in our mind. So, I agree with chairs' opinion at this stage. Thanks, -- Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park) Mobile Convergence Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics. _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
