I agree with Gabriel. We have 2.5 hours in Prague. I think that there
is continued work for the WG, though we need to recharter to do anything
else. If there are no issues that come back from the IESG (doubtful)
then we will use the time to hopefully finalize the rechartering
discussion, otherwise we will work on the IESG comments.
geoff
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 15:38 -0800, gabriel montenegro wrote:
> Well, scheduling (or not) for Prague is orthogonal to progressing
> towards IESG (which I think is cool).
> Now, given that we have a slot in Prague, I imagine we will be able to
> use it to discuss comments
> arising from the IESG review. We're not done yet: I fully expect there
> will be issues brought up
> during IESG discussions. So going now to IESG will give the IESG time
> to review and provide comments,
> and us the time to prepare to have a meaningful f2f in Prague.
>
> -gabriel
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Daniel Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: gabriel montenegro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Carsten Bormann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Geoff Mulligan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Schumacher Christian Peter Pii
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mark Townsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Jari
> Arkko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2007 3:31:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [6lowpan] Re: working group status?
>
> not cool to me...:-(
>
> 6lowpan has been scheduled in Prague for 2.5 hours. What issue will be
> taken place in there ? Both 6lowpan documents are done well. What next
> and working group status ? Closing or rechartering ? At this stage, WG
> should shepherd these consideration for further discussion before f2f
> meeting.
>
> Daniel
>
> On 2/2/07, gabriel montenegro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > ...and I just saw the response from Geoff.
> >
> > Cool, thanks!
> >
> > -gabriel
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: gabriel montenegro
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Carsten Bormann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Geoff Mulligan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > Schumacher Christian Peter Pii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mark
> Townsley
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Jari Arkko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2007 1:57:38 PM
> > Subject: working group status?
> >
> >
> > Carsten, Geoff,
> >
> > Could you *PLEASE* respond on this list with some
> > indication of what the status is?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > -gabriel
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > 6lowpan mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
>
> Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
> Mobile Convergence Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics.
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
