Hi Dominik, Why do you think that RFD's will not be involved with mobility related signalling? Do you assume that RFDs will not move ?
Thanks, -Samita On 3/11/07, Dominik Kaspar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Samita, I think there is one requirement missing, which should state that "reduced-function devices" are not to be involved in any mobility related signaling. Dominik. ----- Original Message ----- Wrom: OYIYZUNNYCGPKYLEJGDGVCJVTLBXFGGMEPYOQKEDO To: <6lowpan@ietf.org> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 8:08 AM Subject: [6lowpan] 6lowpan Mobility requirements draft updated > > Hello All: > > We have published an updated version of 6lowpan mobility goals and > requirements > draft : > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-chakrabarti-mobopts-lowpan-req-01.txt > > The draftname still reflects mobopts wg. We can change name to > publish under 6lowpan flag next time. > > Please read the draft and provide comments in the mailing list. > > Thanks, > -Samita > > _______________________________________________ > 6lowpan mailing list > 6lowpan@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan >
_______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list 6lowpan@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
