Geoff as a Zigbee member tried to coordinate this with them. However, as I understand it, we were unable to obtain clear information even of this frame available to non-members, even if it was for the purpose of avoiding conflicts. That is why we ended up choosing the current value.
Geoff? -gabriel ----- Original Message ---- From: Anthony Schoofs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 6lowpan <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 7:31:02 AM Subject: [6lowpan] Dispatch value bit pattern for 6lowPAN Dear all, In the "Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IEEE 802.15.4 Networks" Internet Draft, section Dispatch type and Header page 7, is mentionned that ".. other non-LowPAN protocols that wish to coexist with LowPAN nodes should include a byte matching this pattern (00 xxxxxx) ..". I had a look at the ZigBee network header and especially at the Frame Type sub-field (the 3 first bits after the 802.15.4 MAC header). For acknowledgement and command frames, the Frame Type value is either 010 or 011 (data frames start with 00). Consequently, it might happen that you get a match with a LoWPAN pattern, and then a problem of coexistence between LowPAN nodes and ZigBee nodes. I would like to know if this coexistence issue was raised before and if it is a matter for the 6LoWPAN WG. Best regards, Anthony -- Anthony Schoofs Philips Research High Tech Campus 37 , 5656 AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
_______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
